Clinton Ties To Russia

Crooked Hillary

The Democrats have vociferously blamed Russia for colluding with the Trump camp and this was the reason for the colossal Hillary Clinton loss on November 8, 2016. When it comes to the Clinton ties to Russia, however, not an eyebrow was raised. 

This fact discredits all who point their finger at Trump and maintain silent about Clinton's culpability. Hillary's closest aides have maintained a hand-in-hand relationship with Russians for years, including while she was in public office. 

The Clinton duo received large sums of money from Russian officials both personally and via The Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow in 2010. The half-million is suspicious enough, but who paid him is startling. 

Show Me The Money 

The Clinton ties to Russia continued when cool cash to Hillary was rendered by a Moscow-based investment firm called Renaissance Capital. This firm is known to have deep-rooted ties to Russian intelligence. The Clinton Foundation also took millions from Viktor Vekselberg's company – the Renova Group. 

Former Russian government official and Chairman of the research company called SuperOx donated millions to the Clinton's. SuperOx was a key part of the "Nuclear Cluster" at the Skolkovo Research Facility – owned by the Russian government. 

The former wife of the Mayor of Moscow channeled money to camp Clinton via her company called JSC Inteco. All this pales in comparison to the 2010 sale of 20% of America's stockpile of uranium to Russia on Hillary's watch. 

Uranium One 

Uranium One is the company that purchased the uranium from Hillary. The Clinton Foundation received $145 million from nine Uranium One shareholders and Bill received $800,000 for a speech from the Russians soon after the transaction was completed. Then Secretary of State (SOS) Hillary had to sign off on the deal before it could come to fruition. 

Just as troublesome was the fact that The Clinton Foundation did not disclose these donations in their tax returns. President Obama had ordered that all payments and donations were to be transparent for all to see. This did not happen. The only reason the U.S. learned of this deal was through Canadian tax records.

Of course, Hillary denied any Clinton ties to Russia and denied knowledge of this deal. The WikiLeaks email leak debunked this fallacy. The Democrats are frantic over the Trump ties to Russia, but this case went unfettered. 

John Podesta 

John Podesta was Hillary's campaign chairman for her failed presidential run in 2016. Podesta had more than just ties with Russia – he went into business with them while he was advising Hillary as SOS. 

In 2011, he was appointed to the executive board of an energy company called Joule Unlimited. After just 60 days on the board, the Russian government invested $35 million into the company. The money came from a branch called Rusnano, which is known as "Putin's child."

John Podesta was advising the U.S. SOS while coterminously working for Putin. John did not disclose this when he was counseling Obama in 2014. This was soon discovered after the Podesta Files from WikiLeaks was released. 

The Clinton ties to Russia run far and run deep. Americans would have never known if it hadn't been exposed by WikiLeaks and non-American sources. The alt-left media will never report anything that would shed a poor light on the dynamic duo. It is difficult to decipher which is more corrupt – the Clinton's or the media. 

Super Blog Directory Web Directory blogville

EatonWeb Blog Directory Web Directory

Russian Hack Is Fake News

Excuses, Excuses

In the beginning, the excuse for Hillary's balked attempt at invading the White House lied at the footstep of FBI Director James Comey. Subsequently, it was a sudden spur of white supremacy that tipped the scales for the Trump landslide win. 

Soon thereafter, acclimations of Anthony Weiner's possession of classified information was the culprit. Next, the blame shifted to Fox News and the alt-right (whatever that is) as culpable for the defeat. 

Then, 'fake news' and Russian hacking were scapegoats for the vanquish of camp Clinton. Nowadays, Vladimir Putin – whom Clinton and Obama had pretended to be friends with – stole the election via hacking.

What does 'hacking' mean? Did Putin find a way to cast votes on machines that were not online? No, that is impossible. Sure, Russia probably hacked the DNC, but that has not been proven to anyone. The CIA based its assessment on circumstantial evidence, which means they think it happened.

Liberal writer Bob Woodward said this about the CIA document on Russia hacking, “That it is a garbage document... it never should have been presented... Trump's right to be upset (angry)...”

Government Corruption

If there was proof-positive evidence of this scenario, the mainstream media would release it at every venue possible. Until this occurs, Americans will simply have no choice but to trust the word of its government. A government that is corrupt at every glimpse.

The American citizenry is supposed to accept what government tells them. Like, there were weapons of mass destruction, the videotape that spurred the Benghazi attack, that the IRS did not do anything wrong during the 2012 election, and that the economy is better than ever.

The same government, along with the mainstream media, is now selling snake oil from Russia. It is impossible for them to acknowledge Hillary's campaign effort was less than vigorous. Simply put; she hid from the media and made little effort to win the vote of working-class Americans.

Fake News Reports Fake News

ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN, are just a few of the many fake news providers. Whatever glorifies the left is what they will report. All of them were certain that Hillary would break the glass ceiling and become the first female American president.

They all got it wrong. How could they miss the tens of thousands of voters showing up to see Trump on the campaign trail? The didn't miss it. They simply downplayed his insurgency to depress Republicans into staying home on election day. They failed.

Trump won more counties than Ronald Reagan did. He broke down the 'blue wall' and won Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Maine, Illinois, and Michigan. Hillary didn't bother to campaign in these states because she thought they were automatic Democrat supporters. She was wrong.

If Clinton had won, the Supreme Court would turn left and it would remain that way for decades. She would make college free. Nothing is free, taxpayers would pay for it. A college degree earned is worth something. A college degree given for free would be worthless.

There would be increases in Food Stamp and Welfare recipients. Corporations would have continued to flee the country. Unemployment would continue to hurt the middle-class. Obama is the first president to never have one single quarter reach three percent GDP. Under Clinton, it would remain at an abysmal rate or worsen.

America has bigger issues than which bathroom people can enter. President Donald J. Trump will put an end to all of this malfeasance and make America great once again. 

Super Blog Directory Web Directory blogville

EatonWeb Blog Directory Web Directory