Thursday, March 30, 2017

Clinton Ties To Russia

Crooked Hillary

The Democrats have vociferously blamed Russia for colluding with the Trump camp and this was the reason for the colossal Hillary Clinton loss on November 8, 2016. When it comes to the Clinton ties to Russia, however, not an eyebrow was raised. 

This fact discredits all who point their finger at Trump and maintain silent about Clinton's culpability. Hillary's closest aides have maintained a hand-in-hand relationship with Russians for years, including while she was in public office. 

The Clinton duo received large sums of money from Russian officials both personally and via The Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow in 2010. The half-million is suspicious enough, but who paid him is startling. 

Show Me The Money 

The Clinton ties to Russia continued when cool cash to Hillary was rendered by a Moscow-based investment firm called Renaissance Capital. This firm is known to have deep-rooted ties to Russian intelligence. The Clinton Foundation also took millions from Viktor Vekselberg's company – the Renova Group. 

Former Russian government official and Chairman of the research company called SuperOx donated millions to the Clinton's. SuperOx was a key part of the "Nuclear Cluster" at the Skolkovo Research Facility – owned by the Russian government. 

The former wife of the Mayor of Moscow channeled money to camp Clinton via her company called JSC Inteco. All this pales in comparison to the 2010 sale of 20% of America's stockpile of uranium to Russia on Hillary's watch. 

Uranium One 

Uranium One is the company that purchased the uranium from Hillary. The Clinton Foundation received $145 million from nine Uranium One shareholders and Bill received $800,000 for a speech from the Russians soon after the transaction was completed. Then Secretary of State (SOS) Hillary had to sign off on the deal before it could come to fruition. 

Just as troublesome was the fact that The Clinton Foundation did not disclose these donations in their tax returns. President Obama had ordered that all payments and donations were to be transparent for all to see. This did not happen. The only reason the U.S. learned of this deal was through Canadian tax records.

Of course, Hillary denied any Clinton ties to Russia and denied knowledge of this deal. The WikiLeaks email leak debunked this fallacy. The Democrats are frantic over the Trump ties to Russia, but this case went unfettered. 

John Podesta 

John Podesta was Hillary's campaign chairman for her failed presidential run in 2016. Podesta had more than just ties with Russia – he went into business with them while he was advising Hillary as SOS. 

In 2011, he was appointed to the executive board of an energy company called Joule Unlimited. After just 60 days on the board, the Russian government invested $35 million into the company. The money came from a branch called Rusnano, which is known as "Putin's child."

John Podesta was advising the U.S. SOS while coterminously working for Putin. John did not disclose this when he was counseling Obama in 2014. This was soon discovered after the Podesta Files from WikiLeaks was released. 

The Clinton ties to Russia run far and run deep. Americans would have never known if it hadn't been exposed by WikiLeaks and non-American sources. The alt-left media will never report anything that would shed a poor light on the dynamic duo. It is difficult to decipher which is more corrupt – the Clinton's or the media. 

Blogarama - Government Blogs Super Blog Directory Blog Directory & Business Pages - Web Directory blogville
EatonWeb Blog Directory Web Directory

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

Obama Interfered With Elections

The Russians Did It 

The popular folklore from the left in Washington is that the alleged "Russian hacking" elected Donald Trump. This, of course, is fake news. The collusory theorem was prompted by Barack Hussein Obama in 2016 during the presidential race between Trump and Clinton.

America's 44th president announced to Russia that they should "knock it off" insofar as hacking the election. This statement not only validated the fallacy to his sheep, but it also suggested to the nation that team Trump had the helping hand of Vladimir Putin at their disposal.  

 Even though the Director of National Intelligence proclaimed that there was no evidence of Russia collusion by saying they "did not change any vote tallies or anything of that sort," the Democrats continued to push this false narrative. They do not require evidence, they simply repeat it over and over and the unknowing citizenry accepts it as fact.  

The FBI has been investigating the phantom Russian interference since June of 2016. 10 months later, they have found nothing. Not one shred of evidentiary material has ever been produced, yet, the left continue to pound their fists. 

“I don’t think we have even began (he should have said 'begun', grammatically speaking) to wake up to what Russia is doing when it comes to cyber warfare. Not only their interference – now proven – in the American presidential campaign, but probably in our own referendum. We don’t have the evidence yet, but I think it is highly probable.” - Barack Obama. 

The preceding statement was evidence that Obama interfered with the election in his own country.

*Obama claimed that he knew about the Russian hacking in the summer of 2016. If this is true, why did he allow it to continue? 

Benjamin Netanyahu 

The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) reported that during the 2015 presidential election in Israel, President Obama gave $349,276 taxpayer dollars to an anti-Netanyahu group to help oust Bibi. This group was called the One Voice Movement. 

PSI Chairman Bob Portman (R-OH) responded to Obama's illegal act with this, “It is completely unacceptable that U.S. taxpayer dollars were used to build a political campaign infrastructure that was deployed — immediately after the grant ended — against the leader [Netanyahu] of our closest ally in the Middle East.  American resources should be used to help our allies in the region, not undermine them.”  

Obama also sent his campaign staff over to the land of Israel and set up camp to defeat the Israeli incumbent president. Obama interfered with elections while claiming the U.S. election was interfered with.

Obama's disdain for Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu was brightly obvious. 

 The United Kingdom 

Leading up to the election and Brexit in 2016, President Obama warned the Brits not the leave the European Union. He stated that if they do leave the Union, they would be sent "to the back of the line" as it pertains to business with the United States. 

This was not an election, but he interfered with their policy. He said this at a dual press conference with Prime Minister David Cameron, "I think this membership in the EU makes you guys bigger players."  

British lawmaker Jacob Rees-Mogg replied to the U.S. Commander In Chief with this, “I can’t think the British people will want to be told what to do by a rather unsuccessful American president who has had one of the least successful foreign policies in modern history,”

Obama interfered with elections and policy of England and the media was just fine with it.

The IRS Scandal 

Soon after the ObamaCare debacle was passed into law, the Tea Party was formed. These folks increased the Republican vote by approximately 4.5 million votes in 2010. In 2012, however, this increased had all but vanished.

The reason is obvious; the IRS had orders to shut down all Tea Party affiliates that request a tax-exempt status. Hundreds of these affiliates were denied whereas just six left-leaning groups were denied. All six were approved in less than three months. 

The Tea Party affiliates were delayed for years and some are still waiting for approval. Obama interfering with the election undoubtedly had a great effect on his 2012 presidential victory. No one from the IRS was held responsible and no one was fired. The media swept this under the rug because it helped launch their beloved Barack Obama into a second term while at the helm of the worst economy since WWII. 

*To be fair, the U.S. has interfered with 81 foreign elections since 1946. 

Blogarama - Government Blogs Super Blog Directory Blog Directory & Business Pages - Web Directory blogville
EatonWeb Blog Directory Web Directory